.jpg)
on a side note, it looks like I might have burned a little over the weekend. Terrible, I always try to make a point of protecting my skin, and on the chest, man I don't ever want leather chest, horrifying!
I see women in their late 20's already starting to look a little leathery in that area and/or sporting the first signs of crows feet and wonder if they really think being a little brown now is going to be worth it later (when you are really struggling to stay attractive) I'd have to advise the answer is NO. Seriously, 85% of the reason I do not look 42 (or in the case of some people even older than that at 42) is because of NOT tanning, EVER. I mean come on, at 42 I wake up and look a little tired, my skin isn't as dewy fresh as it once was but those things can be worked with, can you imagine if I had sun damage on top of the natural aging process?
I was one of those rare teenagers who actually believed that tanning would fuck up my skin when I got older and I didn't want that. You can fake A LOT of things but shitty skin is what it is.
2 dirty hippies blowing your mind:
I know exactly what you mean. I hate that fake brown skin look.
When we were kids, laying in the sun all day was encouraged, there wasnt really any info about skin cancers. I think I might have been 15 when my mom finally decided I should wear sunscreen.
now I am super obsessive that my daughter wears sunscreen all the time. With reapplications!!
You can never be too safe.
cute necklace btw :)
True enough, I suppose as a child I was out in the sun and tanned, but fortunately I started thinking about the consequences around 13. I guess it's the burns you get as a kid though that can really affect your skin cancer issues later or so I've heard; I do recall having 1 or 2 nasty burns as a kid so in that respect I probably have some small degree of damage that could be a problem cancer-wise?
Post a Comment